{"id":5377,"date":"2013-01-17T13:40:20","date_gmt":"2013-01-17T02:40:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wordconstructions.com.au\/blog\/?p=5377"},"modified":"2013-01-17T13:42:04","modified_gmt":"2013-01-17T02:42:04","slug":"write-great-client-letters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wordconstructions.com.au\/blog\/2013\/01\/write-great-client-letters\/","title":{"rendered":"You can write great client letters"},"content":{"rendered":"

I wrote about an officious bank letter <\/a>that resulted in me closing\u00a0my account.<\/p>\n

\"two<\/a>

Professional looking letters are part of your brand<\/p><\/div>\n

There was more to that letter for teaching about good letter construction, so here are some tips for you…<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. the letter was on two pages
    \nThis was unnecessary, unavoidable and can really annoy readers. It looks longer so is off-putting and is just a waste of effort. With better writing it could easily have been shorter and their letter format included a lot of wasted space.<\/li>\n
  2. one line of the letter contained only ‘if:’
    \nIt is best practice to avoid a single word on a line (designers call this as leaving\u00a0orphans and widows), especially such a short word<\/li>\n
  3. every number in the letter was written as ‘three (3) years’
    \nFrankly, people can either read or they can’t, so     ‘three’ or ‘3’ is sufficient<\/a>\u00a0– adding both is unnecessary\u00a0and looks wrong<\/li>\n
  4. first sentence is 3.5 lines long…
    \nIt was simply too long, both visually and for comprehension.     When in doubt, go for shorter<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  5. lack of clarity throughout the letter
    \nThe letter went from the\u00a0consequences to the\u00a0definition to the impact for me so it was hard to follow – I had no reason to care about the consequences until I knew the relevance\u00a0and definition!
    \nRemember to explain the\u00a0relevance of any information first. They could also have improved it a lot by using a sub-heading for the\u00a0full definition of inactive account – I could skim that section or read it for details without feeling\u00a0confused.<\/li>\n
  6. a missed personalisation opportunity
    \nThe letter stated ‘your account referred to above’ – it’s not hard to mail merge\u00a0(and they were already merging in my name and address!) so why not use ‘your xyz account’ which is more personal and easier to read<\/li>\n
  7. an entire section was irrelevant to me
    \nwhy include a long paragraph, including two bullet points, on offset deposit accounts when I don’t have one? Setting up a conditional rule on this paragraph would be easy to do so it only goes to relevant\u00a0clients. Or at least have it under a sub-heading so it doesn’t clutter the main letter and distract from the meaning<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

     <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    I wrote about an officious bank letter that resulted in me closing\u00a0my account. There was more to that letter for teaching about good letter construction, so here are some tips for you… the letter was on two pages This was unnecessary, unavoidable and can really annoy readers. It looks longer so is off-putting and is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,1425],"tags":[424,304,905,185],"class_list":["post-5377","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bad-writing-examples","category-business-communications","tag-client","tag-effective","tag-letter","tag-write"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t